Vitorio Dimov

The EU Regulation on Artificial Intelligence (AI Regulation, AI Regulation or AI Act) has been in force since 2 February 2025 and introduces the first binding obligations. A central regulation concerns the obligation of companies to train their employees* in the use of AI systems if AI systems are used (e.g. in the HR department, in customer service or in sales). The following article looks at what this means for companies and their employees in concrete terms and the consequences of a possible breach:

The debate surrounding the monetisation of video games has long since become a core issue within the gaming world. For some time now, the focus has primarily been on all forms of loot boxes. However, the constant evolution of technology, society, and the economy has introduced a challenger to loot boxes as a prevalent and long-term monetisation system: the Battle Pass.

Legal disputes in esports can be costly and time-consuming, especially when it comes to salaries, prize money, or transfers. Besides mediation, a traditional system involves entering into an arbitration agreement and conducting subsequent arbitration proceedings (often referred to as "Alternative Dispute Resolution" or "ADR"). Riot Games, one of the leading publishers in gaming and esports, has recently introduced an innovative arbitration system in the esports sphere for the EMEA region with its newly unveiled Dispute Resolution System (Riot DR). The aim is to provide quick, fair, and cost-efficient solutions to legal conflicts in the competitive leagues of League of Legends (LoL) and Valorant.

How do AI-generated NPCs and deep fakes affect personal rights in video games? Discover the legal risks and the requirements of the AI Regulation - from naming rights to image and voting rights.

When considering the extent to which companies need to train their employees and whether an AI officer is required in connection with the use of AI, the future reference point will be the Artificial Intelligence Act (commonly referred to as the AI Act). The key provision is Article 4 of the AI Act, which regulates the requirements for companies regarding their „AI literacy.“ Article 4 stipulates that providers and operators of AI systems must take measures to ensure an „adequate level of AI literacy” among their employees and other persons involved in the operation and use of AI systems on their behalf. In addition to technical knowledge, the law also specifies appropriate training to determine the adequate level of literacy.

The risk classification under the AI Act determines the obligations and requirements for companies using AI in their operations or products. In this article, we explain how the various risk classes are structured and how you can determine which category the AI-tools used or developed by you fall into.

The AI Act came into force in Augst 2024. The first wave of obligations arising from it are already applicable since the beginning of this February 2025. For companies using or intending to offer AI-based or AI-assisted products, determining whether the AI Act applies to them is crucial.

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has far-reaching impacts on all areas of life. The European Union (EU) has recognized that an appropriate legal framework is necessary to ensure the responsible use of AI and aims to be a leader in trustworthiness as well as innovation. For this reason, the AI Act has been enacted. The regulation, which has direct effect in the member states, sets clear rules and standards for dealing with AI models, AI systems, and AI content.

The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) raises numerous legal questions – particularly regarding liability.