In a recent judgement, the ECJ ruled on the application of general terms and conditions to training contracts with junior athletes.

Fair financial burden sharing or a dam break for the financing of public security policy? In its judgement last Tuesday, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that the levying of fees for police operations at high-risk matches at the expense of the DFL in the form of the Bremen fee schedule is constitutional. Is the decision correct? Is the confirmed procedure for charging fees in Bremen a fair distribution of the financial burden or is it a breach of the dam for the private financing of public security policy? An overview:

The Federal Constitutional Court has confirmed the fee regulation for police costs at high-risk matches. This raises questions as to whether other profit-orientated major events such as concerts, trade fairs or congresses could also be charged for police costs in future. The event industry remains concerned.