Anna Gauselmann

In its judgement of 22 May 2020, the Schleswig-Holstein Higher Labour Court ruled that in the event of complications arising after a tattoo, there is no entitlement to continued payment of remuneration for the period of the resulting incapacity to work (judgement of 22 May 2020, case no. 5 Sa 284 a/24).

In a decision dated 10 March 2025, the Hessian Regional Labour Court ruled that the unauthorised forwarding of professional content to a private email account can lead to exclusion from the works council. (Hessisches LAG, judgement of 10 March 2025, Ref.: 16 TaBV 109/24).

In its judgment of 4 October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that an apology may be sufficient as reasonable compensation for non-material damage under Art. 82 GDPR (ECJ, judgment of 4.10.2024, Ref. C-507/23).

In its judgement of 26 September 2024, the Duisburg Labour Court ruled that an employee is entitled to compensation in accordance with Art 82 GDPR in the amount of EUR 10,000.00 because his employer passed on health data to third parties without authorisation (Duisburg Labour Court, judgement of 26 September 2024, Ref. 3 Ca 77/24)

Wenn die Werbung für ein Produkt lauterkeitsrechtlich verboten wurde, muss der Schuldner das Werbematerials entfernen lassen.